Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta bolichicos. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta bolichicos. Mostrar todas las entradas

jueves, 2 de octubre de 2014

@AlekBoyd / INFODIO: How to steal 70 Million dollars in a day: Derwick Associates Style



    There are many things we still don't know about Derwick Associates, but there's one we do know: Alejandro Betancourt (left), Pedro Trebbau and Jeff Canon (right) swindled -at the very least- $70 million USD from the Venezuelan State.


Do readers remember Adam Kaufmann? Former New York's District Attorney's Office über prosecutor cum Derwick Associates lawyer, who went on the record, on the Wall Street Journal no less, saying "We are a transparent company and have nothing to hide"? Well, vindication's a bitch, isn't Adam? As it turns, someone has leaked documents straight from within Derwick Associates' office in Caracas, and what do we find about this "transparent company"? We find a $277 million purchase order from BARIVEN (a PDVSA subsidiary), addressed to Pedro Trebbau (one of Derwick Associates main execs) for a bunch of turbines. We also find a $207 million "Equipment Purchase Agreement" between Alejandro Betancourt (another of Derwick Associates execs) and Jeff Canon from Energy Parts Solution (a division of ProEnergy Services). What else do we find? We find that both documents refer to the same equipment and have the same date: December 30, 2009. Which means, in Kaufmann's own words, it is "transparent" that in concurrent transactions that took place the same day Derwick Associates stole $70 million from BARIVEN. Take it away Adam, all the way to discovery mate!


UPDATE: in my inbox this morning a link to an article (in Spanish) about another $66 million deal between Jeff Canon's Energy Parts Solution and CORPOELEC, where it is laid out, transparently, how Canon's company paid $9.3 million worth of commissions to Omar Petit ($1.3 million) and Khaled ($8 million). Long time readers of my blogs perhaps will remember who that Khaled may be. But the interesting point is the booking of that bribe payment in the pricing summary provided by Canon's Energy Parts Solution (see below). How will Jeff Canon justify / explain to U.S. authorities currently probing his ProEnergy company those payments? Furthermore, if evidence of payment of bribes has already emerged in a different deal, who is to believe that Canon, and/or Betancourt, and/or Trebbau, and/or Francisco D'Agostino, and/or some other associate in their stead, did not incur in exactly the same practice of paying bribes to Venezuelan officials to get contracts without bidding? Derwick claims in its defense in various lawsuits that all contracting done with the Venezuelan State was above board, open, public and legitimate, despite the fact that there is no evidence to support that claim anywhere. Derwick could have well been contracted under special circumstances (emergency decree), which allow officials to grant contracts directly, without much ado. But if that was the case, the question -considering Derwick's absolute lack of a verifiable track record- is: if not through nepotism and bribe payment, how come 12 contracts worth billions were granted to them directly?

sábado, 9 de agosto de 2014

[English] @alekboyd / Infodio / The Wall Street Journal does Derwick Associates

Tomado de Infodio.com con el permiso del autor, Alek Boyd, su más reciente artículo sobre la reseña del Wall Street Journal sobre el escándalo de corrupción de la mafia Convit- Guruceaga-Betancourt - Lopez y compañía. 
Vale la pena también leer el artículo de prensa del periodista Alfredo Meza para el diario El país de España: http://internacional.elpais.com/internacional/2014/08/09/actualidad/1407540747_507459.html

Los dejamos con el artículo en inglés de alek Boyd 

Finally, a major publication like the Wall Street Journal picked up on the gargantuan corruption racket that Derwick Associates has been involved in in Venezuela. In "Venezuelan Energy Company Investigated in U.S.
Derwick Associates Is Probed by U.S., New York Agencies for Possible Bribery, Banking Violations
", the WSJ goes to town on some of the issues readers of this blog have been aware of for quite some time:

NEW YORK—Federal and New York City prosecutors opened preliminary investigations into a Venezuelan company that became one of that country's leading builders of power plants during the administration of President Hugo Chávez, as well as into a Missouri-based company that played a key role in its success, according to people familiar with the matter.

The U.S. Department of Justice and the Manhattan district attorney's office are probing Derwick Associates, a Venezuelan company awarded hundreds of millions of dollars in contracts in little more than a year to build power plants in Venezuela, shortly after the country's power grid began to sputter in 2009, the people familiar with the matter said.

ProEnergy Services, a Sedalia, Mo.-based engineering, procurement and construction company that sold dozens of turbines to Derwick and helped build the plants, is also under investigation, these people said.

The probes are in their initial phases, the people said, and it is possible both investigations could be closed without criminal charges being brought.

Derwick Associates President Alejandro Betancourt in his Caracas, Venezuela, headquarters.

"Neither Derwick nor its principals have been contacted by any U.S. law enforcement agency," said Derwick President Alejandro Betancourt, in a statement provided by lawyer Adam Kaufmann. "We therefore question whether Derwick is the focus of any active investigation. In the event we are contacted by a law enforcement agency, we will cooperate fully. We are a transparent company and have nothing to hide."

A ProEnergy representative declined to comment on any investigation and said the company "is committed to doing business in full compliance with all applicable laws and to cooperating fully with regulatory and legal inquiries."

Manhattan prosecutors are investigating Derwick and ProEnergy for possible violations of New York banking law, people familiar with the matter said.

Meanwhile, people familiar with the matter said prosecutors in the Justice Department's criminal fraud section are reviewing the actions of Derwick and ProEnergy for possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which prohibits offering foreign government officials improper payments in exchange for a business advantage.

Federal prosecutors are scrutinizing the difference between the prices ProEnergy charged Derwick for its equipment and the prices Derwick ultimately charged the Venezuelan government, one person familiar with the matter said. The person said that in some past FCPA cases, excessive margins have been used to conceal bribes to foreign officials.

A lawyer for Derwick voluntarily contacted and met with federal prosecutors last summer to discuss the FCPA investigation, a person familiar with the matter said. Those prosecutors haven't requested documents from Derwick, the person said.

"As we understand it, there has been a long-running investigation into ProEnergy, but that doesn't equate to an investigation into Derwick," Mr. Kaufmann wrote in a letter to the Journal.

In Caracas, Mr. Betancourt said Derwick didn't bribe any Venezuelan officials. He said Derwick won the contracts through competitive bidding because it made superior offers. He also said the company's margins were consistent with general industry practice and reflected the high financial risks taken on by Derwick during a difficult time to do business in Venezuela.

A spokesman at Venezuela's information ministry declined to comment, while spokesmen at the electricity and energy ministries didn't return calls seeking comment.

Mr. Betancourt and a cousin, Pedro Trebbau, registered Derwick in Venezuela in 2009 and drew the attention of opponents of the Chávez regime because of the large volume of business they did with the government.

Otto Reich, the top State Department official for Latin America during the administration of President George W. Bush, filed a civil lawsuit in New York federal court last year, alleging Derwick's founding cousins damaged his consulting business by falsely spreading the word that he was working for them. The lawsuit alleges Derwick and the company's owners, among others, obtained contracts to build power stations in return for paying multimillion-dollar bribes to senior Venezuelan officials.

Mr. Kaufmann, a partner with Lewis Baach PLLC, said the lawsuit is part of a smear campaign against Derwick, motivated by politics and family squabbles, and lawyers for Messrs. Betancourt and Trebbau have moved to dismiss it. "My clients categorically deny any allegations of paying bribes to anyone," Mr. Kaufmann said. "But for the damage it has caused, Reich's lawsuit is laughable, and his allegations are wholly without evidentiary foundation," he wrote in a letter to the Journal.

The Manhattan district attorney's office, which has jurisdiction over violations of New York state banking laws, is interested in Derwick's relationship with J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., according to people familiar with the matter. Investigators have interviewed potential witnesses about Eduardo Travieso, a childhood friend of Mr. Trebbau who worked at J.P. Morgan and served as Derwick's banker there, according to people familiar with the matter.

In March 2013, Mr. Travieso resigned from J.P. Morgan. In a report made public by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, an industry watchdog, J.P. Morgan alleged Mr. Travieso had acted in a manner "inconsistent with the firm's policies and procedures and may have violated applicable regulatory requirements, including using his residential address as the mailing address for certain customer communications."

Finra, which reported this year that it has made a preliminary determination to bring disciplinary action against Mr. Travieso for "potential violations" of certain rules, declined to comment, as did J.P. Morgan.

Attempts to reach Mr. Travieso through his father, a Caracas lawyer, were unsuccessful. A message to Mr. Travieso sent through his LinkedIn account went unanswered. Mr. Travieso's lawyer declined to comment.

There's a couple of points I would like to make. Uncle Sam has been a keen reader of my writings since vcrisis.com days, that is at least 10 years. U.S. Federal Agencies have been gathering information on Derwick-like Venezuelan thugs for a very long time. Just imagine the sort of files they must have compiled over the years. So when the WSJ dares to print that Derwick Associates is being probed, you can bet top dollar that: 1) there's truth to claims published by me and others about possible investigations into corruption scandals involving American companies in Venezuela; 2) these investigations take time, and are most certainly helped by companies, such as Derwick Associates, that go around suing, threatening, censoring, and rubbing their ill gotten wealth on everyone's faces; 3) regardless of what Derwick Associates claims, to the effect that they are "a transparent company and have nothing to hide", the fact is no authority, much less a number of them, would have launched an investigation into Derwick's activities based on false information, for what the WSJ did not print is that the FBI, the IRS, the Treasury and the SEC are also on Derwick's case.

So let me put it publicly, for Derwick's attentive reading: no Venezuelan can get the FBI, the IRS, the Treasury, DoJ, DoS, SEC, plus Federal and New York prosecutors to join in a "smear campaign" against you. This, you brought upon yourselves, when you had the fantastic idea of suing a Venezuelan bank in New York, and then in Florida, and after that you instructed Hector Torres to threaten all and sundry who dared report the case. And before you go claiming again through your new lawyer -it seems like you guys have a weakness for lawyers that have a disconnect between mouth and brain- that this is a "meritless, blogger-conspiracy financed by Oscar Garcia Mendoza", do have at the very least the presence of mind of remembering that award-winning journalist Cesar Batiz, at the time working for Ultimas Noticias (when it was "independent"), was the one who exposed your corrupt deals with former school friends, through which you started getting contracts from Venezuelan public institutions. 

Derwick Associates never won "competitive bids". In the multiple occasions that Batiz and Ultimas Noticias asked Derwick Associates to reveal details of the contracts it had gotten from the Venezuelan State -bold added with the purpose of highlighting the fact that this is public money we are talking about- the company refused, repeatedly, to come clean. Derwick Associates has never been a "transparent company". Quite the opposite in fact.

There's only one Letter of Intent between Derwick Associates and BARIVEN -a PDVSA subsidiary- that has been published thus far, thanks to a leak to this site. The document reveals that both parties agreed to illegal confidentiality clauses and even waived Venezuela's legislation and jurisdiction over matters pertaining the contract. I would love to hear Derwick's new lawyer -Adam Kaufmann- explain, based on his former life as Chief Investigator for Manhattan's District Attorney's Office, how would a similar deal between a private company and U.S. public institutions be perceived according to current U.S. laws. It seems lost on Kaufmann that you can't bank on track record as a star employee of Manhattan's DA's Office and then question investigations of the very office upon which you've based your subsequent career.

Then there's the money laundering, in which JP Morgan has only been too happy to participate. JP Morgan not only laundered huge sums for Derwick: it also acted as mortgage provider AND proxy in a multimillion-dollar property purchase in New York, which, coincidentally, Derwick wants to dispose of now.

As of this writing, according to Venezuela's Contractors Registry Derwick Associates is suspended. None of its contracts have been finished. Despite Alejandro Betancourt's false claims, to the effect that thanks to his company Caracas no longer suffers from blackouts, these problems are far from over.

Derwick's arguments are lie upon lie upon lie, about credentials, about capacity, about expertise, about how it was contracted, about their executives, about their commercial relations with chavismo, about their wealth... There's hardly a word of truth in their statements that can be corroborated elsewhere. Only in Venezuela, and only with chavismo in power, could these people do what they've done. We should be grateful that American authorities have an interest in the likes of Derwick, and be equally grateful towards the WSJ for shining a light on corruption in our battered nation.

Now onwards and upwards towards the next target of my research: Roberto Rincón and his companies.

viernes, 1 de agosto de 2014

Carta de Derwick a Reporteros Sin Fronteras

The good folks from Reporters Without Borders published in its We Fight Censorship website a post entitled "Corruption Off Limits on Venezuelan Internet", where censorship of this website in Venezuela is exposed. To be frank, I was expecting a reaction from those exposed, i.e. Derwick Associates (now rebranded as Derwick, as shown in letter below). In its "clarification" letter to Reporters Without Borders, Derwick claims the following:

El pasado 29 de marzo su organización se hizo eco de una información que relaciona a Derwick con el bloqueo que las autoridades de CONATEL ordenaron sobre el blog www.infodio.com. 

Translation: "On 29 March, your organization echoed information pertaining the relation between Derwick and the ban thatCONATEL authorities ordered against infodio.com".

So here's Derwick, pretending to be completely unrelated to the ban that the Venezuelan telecoms watchdog imposed on this website. Readers may remember that this site was censored in Venezuela, on 16 January 2014, right after publishing a post about an amended claim that Otto Reich had introduced in his RICO lawsuit against Derwick, and its execs Alejandro Betancourt, Pedro Trebbau and Francisco D'Agostino. I had heard from readers using Inter as ISP that they could not access infodio.com in Venezuela, so I took to Twitter to ask for corroboration. Some said they could access it, some said they couldn't. But what started with Inter soon became a general ban. By 17 January Inter, Movistar, Supercable and CANTV users reported that they couldn't access this site

On 18 July 2013, reputed Venezuelan journalist Nelson Bocaranda reported that "some Bolichicos had paid $45 million for one of the most important cable operators in the country", adding that the deal had been done in Texas:

"45 millones de dólares habría sido la suma pagada por algunos “bolichicos”, los muy jóvenes empresarios boliburgueses que crecieron a la sombra del drama eléctrico, por uno de los operadores de cable más importantes del país. La firma fue en Texas…"

Later on that day, I commented on the deal, based on information I had received from a source:

"Bocaranda likes cryptic language and is having to defend himself in chavista kangaroo courts nowadays, so let me spell his message out: Derwick Associates has purchased Intercable, from HM Capital Partners, for $45 million."

Months will pass, and then I heard about the deal again, from a completely different source, who told me that Yosef Maiman (shareholder of Inter) had sold a stake to Alejandro Betancourt and Francisco D'Agostino. The correct thing for me to do was to ask HM Capital and Yosef Maiman whether there was any truth to the allegations (apart from bribing attempts by stepfather of Alejandro Betancourt, none of the Derwick execs has ever replied to my requests for comment). I also sent a request for comment to Bernard Aronson, from ACON Investment. The reason being, ACON Investments is quoted in press releases about a $100 million worth of equity given to ProEnergy Services, which is the subcontractor that Derwick used in all of its Venezuela projects. Then there's Daniel Jinich, Managing Partner at ACON, which he joined after a time with HM Capital. Given what I heard about HM Capital's involvement in the deal, I thought appropriate to try and get a word from then. Alas no one replied.

So what do we have here? An "energy company" that claims that it has nothing to do with provision of internet services, or indeed with Inter, sends a letter to Reporters Without Borders and reveals that CONATEL authorities ordered ISPs to censor this site. My question is: how does Derwick know that CONATEL issued an order to have this site banned, if it has got nothing to do with provision of internet services? Do we have to assume that energy companies are also informed by CONATEL -as a matter of practice- about their censorship measures?

But then, Derwick answers the question:

...la acción ordenada por las autoridades deriva de una acción legal interpuesta por personas que no tienen ni han tenido vínculo alguno con nuestra organización

Read, the order [to ban infodio.com] comes from a legal action filed by people that have no relation whatsoever with Derwick. My question is: what legal action is Derwick privy of, from people that have "no relation whatsoever" with their organization? Therefore, not only is Derwick au courrant of CONATEL's censorship orders, it also knows the reasons for such orders!

I believe that letter from Derwick only serves one purpose: to undermine their credibility even more (if that's possible).

Sources have told me that Derwick has, in fact, an excellent relation with SEBIN (Venezuela's intelligence service), as journalist Cesar Batiz can attest. Furthermore, I have been told that Derwick gave a direct order to Rolando Esser de Lima(CANTV's Security Chief) to block infodio.com. While it's almost impossible to demonstrate this, unless my kind informants make good on their promise to leak the actual order, it remains a fact that Inter was the first ISP that blocked this site, and others followed. It also remains a fact that, as of this writing, infodio.com continues to be censored by mentioned ISPs, including CANTV, the State owned telecoms giant that accounts for 80% of internet traffic in Venezuela. Finally, it is also true that the measure came after I posted an update on the RICO lawsuit against Derwick in New York. 

Then we have the little details, such as Derwick's claims to be privy of information that, by the very nature of their line of business, it should not be privy of, or letter sent to Reporters Without Borders dated the day before it was actually written (as per metadata), mind you, it would appear that Derwick is determined to completely bury their already battered credibility.


Este artículo fue reproducido con la autorización de Alek Boyd.